Idaho Civil Rule 16: Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; ManagementPersonal injury cases are added to the court’s schedule after they are filed. Idaho Civil Rule 16 gives instructions on how to ensure that scheduling goes smoothly. The first is that if an answer has been filed, but one or more defendants have not appeared within 30 days (or 90 days after a complaint has been filed), the court has to take action and schedule a conference asking the parties when they are available for trial. This makes sure that the plaintiff and defendant are not waiting forever before they get their chance to appear in court.

Next, Idaho Civil Rule 16 describes the format that the scheduling order must be in and necessary information that a scheduling order must contain in order to conform to the rule. The rule also states that the scheduling order cannot be modified unless the court allows. The court will only allow the scheduling order to be modified if good cause is shown.

In addition, Idaho Civil Rule 16 states how there has to be a final pretrial conference and lists the subjects that can be discussed at that pretrial conference.

Lastly, Idaho Civil Rule 16 describes possible sanctions if the rule is not followed.

After an Accident, Look to Brent Gordon Law Firm

After an accident, you need an experienced, trusted and aggressive personal injury attorney from Brent Gordon Law Firm to fight for every penny you deserve. Our law firm believes every client deserves fair representation against big insurance companies with deep pockets. Call our Pocatello or Idaho Falls law office now for a free consultation. Call (208) 232-7274 now.

Idaho Civil Rule 16: Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management

  1. Scheduling conferences and orders.
    • Scheduling conferences; When held. Within 30 days after an answer or notice of appearance has been filed, or, within 90 days after a complaint has been filed, if one or more defendants have been served but no appearance has been made, a court must take action, by setting a scheduling conference, requesting available trial dates, or by another method within the discretion of the presiding judge, which results in the filing of a scheduling order as soon as practicable after the action taken by the court.
    • Scheduling order. The scheduling order must address:
      1. the setting of date(s) for trial and any pre-trial conferences;
      2. the setting of deadlines for joining other parties and amending the pleadings; for filing and hearing dispositive motions; for completing discovery; and, for disclosing expert witnesses;
      3. the advisability of ordering mediation or ADR;
      4. the need for a special master where appropriate; and
      5. any other matter which would aid in the speedy, fair and efficient disposition of the case.
    • Modification of scheduling order. The dates set by the court in section (A) above must not be modified except by leave of the court on a showing of good cause. The dates and deadlines in the scheduling order pursuant to subdivision (B) above must not be modified except by leave of the court on a showing of good cause or by stipulation of all the parties and approval of the court.
  2. Request for trial setting by a party.
    • In general.Should the court fail to set the matter for scheduling conference or otherwise to set the matter for trial, after all defendants have appeared, a party may request that the court set the matter for trial and that any other deadlines and pretrial conferences be established.
    • Information to be included. The request must indicate:
      1. the nature of the case;
      2. whether a jury trial has been demanded;
      3. whether referral to alternative dispute resolution would be beneficial;
      4. an estimate of the time required for trial;
      5. the name of the attorney who will appear at trial; and
      6. the dates upon which the attorney and party would not be available for trial.
    • Response to the request by other parties. A response must be filed and served within 7 days after being served with the request for trial setting. The response must contain the information required in subsection (b)(2) of this rule.
    • Action by the court. After the time for filing a response to the request has passed, the court must either issue a scheduling order pursuant to subsection (a)(2) of this rule or set the request for hearing.
  3. Final pretrial conference and order.
    • Final pretrial procedure. At least 30 days before trial, the court must engage in a pretrial process, which may include a formal pretrial conference, a pretrial memorandum submitted by the parties, pretrial submissions by stipulation of the parties, or other methods within the discretion of the court, by which the parties are required to confirm that the matter is proceeding to trial in the manner required by the scheduling order. If a formal pretrial conference is held, at least one attorney for each represented party participating in the pretrial conference must have authority to enter into stipulations and to make admissions regarding all matters that may be reasonably anticipated. If a formal pretrial conference is held, it must be on the record.
    • Subjects to be discussed at pretrial conference. At a pretrial conference, the court may consider and resolve the following:
      1. the status of mediation or ADR;
      2. the disposition of any pending motions;
      3. the possibility of obtaining admissions of fact;
      4. stipulations regarding the authenticity of exhibits;
      5. the advisability of any advanced rulings from the court concerning the admissibility of evidence;
      6. the avoidance of unnecessary proof and of cumulative evidence;
      7. the necessity of amendments to the pleadings pursuant to Rule 15(b);
      8. the formulation and simplification of the issues to be presented at trial, including the elimination of abandoned or unsustainable claims and defenses;
      9. the identification of witnesses and exhibits;
      10. the pre-marking of exhibits and procedures for the handling of exhibits, in conformance with Idaho Court Administrative Rule 71;
      11. jury instructions and jury selection issues;
      12. the need for an interpreter for any party or witness;
      13. the need for pre-trial briefing, and filing deadlines, if necessary;
      14. the availability and use of any technology in the courtroom; and
      15. any other matter which would aid in the fair and efficient resolution of the case.
  1. Exhibits and witnesses. The court may order the parties to file a list of all trial exhibits and names and addresses of witnesses who may testify, except impeachment exhibits and witnesses. Exhibits and witnesses discovered after the date set for disclosure must be supplemented, indicating the date the exhibit or witness was discovered. The court may exclude any untimely disclosed witness or exhibit, except for good cause and to prevent injustice.
    • The court may sanction any party or attorney if a party or attorney:
      1. fails to obey a scheduling or pretrial order;
      2. fails to appear at a scheduling or pretrial conference;
      3. is substantially unprepared to participate in a scheduling or pretrial conference; or
      4. fails to participate in good faith.
    • Sanctions allowed.The court may make such orders as are just, and may, along with any other sanction, make any of the orders allowed under Rule 37(b)(2)(A). Also, in addition to or in the place of any other sanction, the court must require the party or the party’s attorney, or both, pay any expenses incurred because of noncompliance with this rule, including attorney’s fees, unless the court finds noncompliance was substantially justified or that circumstance are such that such an award of expenses would be unjust.


Free Consultation

You Pay Nothing Until We Win Your Case

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

Idaho Falls Law Office

Our Idaho Falls, Idaho law office services clients in and surrounding Idaho Falls, including for injuries and accidents in Ammon, Rigby, injuries and accidents in Shelly and Blackfoot, and injuries and accidents in Rexburg. If you are looking for an attorney in the Idaho Falls area, visit or call our Idaho Falls office now. 477 Shoup Ave, Suite 101 Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Phone:(208) 552-0467

Brent Gordon Law

Facebook Twitter Google+ Instagram

Pocatello Law Office

Our Pocatello, Idaho law office services clients in and surrounding Pocatello, including for injuries and accidents in Chubbuck. If you are looking for an attorney in the Pocatello area, call our Pocatello office now. Our experienced personal injury attorneys will work hard to get you the compensation you deserve. Call (208) 232-7274 for a free consultation. 154 North Main St. Pocatello, ID 83204 Phone:(208) 232-7274

Brent Gordon Law

Facebook Twitter Google+ Instagram

Practice Areas

Southeast Idaho Personal Injury Attorney Idaho Falls Personal Injury Attorney Pocatello Personal Injury Attorney Blackfoot Personal Injury Attorney Rexburg Personal Injury Attorney Rigby Personal Injury Attorney Car Accidents Worker’s Compensation Semi Truck Accidents Motorcycle Accidents Wrongful Death Dog Bite Injuries Slip and Fall Accidents Bicycle Accidents Site Map